
除了那年我看不起的公鹿奪冠外,每年都是東岸幫我賺錢。不過今年特別爽,原本的保險票居然中了28倍大獎!
難得糊塗 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣(47)
今年NBA總冠軍塵埃落定。金州勇士經歷浪花兄弟先後傷癒復出,KD出走後重建,三年後重登王座,完成八年四冠佳績。擅用新人助其成長,包括Looney, Pole, PaytonII, 還有Wiggins打出狀元級表現,是成功關鍵。原來的鐵三角Curry, Green, Thompson, 明顯有歲月趨人老的感覺,Thompson傷癒後的今天防守腳步明顯跟不上,三分也不再神準,總體表現只是中等平平,Green也毫無驚喜,唯有Curry, 雖然幾番掙扎三分球不算太穩定,但關鍵時刻始終打出決定性的巨星風采。被捧上天的Tatum,創了一個前無古人後無來者的單季後賽100失誤紀錄,十全十美,將變成百年笑話(我保證25年後的NBA100周年,絕對會談起這個100紀錄)。比起94/95關鍵領先的魔術連失四個罰球最後被火箭一舉殲滅的罪臣Nick Anderson, 97/98 Michael Jordan最後一擺一跳完成最後一箭封神而甩在腳下的Bryant Russell, 這個身分地位更高的Tatum一輩子應該創傷更深。所有NBA職業球員從此都會戒慎恐懼,絕不會容許自己靠近這項紀錄。難得糊塗 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣(40)

|
2008 |
Los Angeles Lakers (1) (29, 14–15) |
Phil Jackson |
2–4 |
Boston Celtics (1) (20, 17–3) |
Doc Rivers |
[86] |
2009 |
Los Angeles Lakers (1) (30, 15–15) |
Phil Jackson |
4–1 |
Orlando Magic (3) (2, 0–2) |
Stan Van Gundy |
[87] |
2010 |
Los Angeles Lakers (1) (31, 16–15) |
Phil Jackson |
4–3 |
Boston Celtics (4) (21, 17–4) |
Doc Rivers |
[88] |
2011 |
Dallas Mavericks (3) (2, 1–1) |
Rick Carlisle |
4–2 |
Miami Heat (2) (2, 1–1) |
Erik Spoelstra |
[89] |
2012[f] |
Oklahoma City Thunder (2) (4, 1–3) |
Scott Brooks |
1–4 |
Miami Heat (2) (3, 2–1) |
Erik Spoelstra |
[92] |
2013 |
San Antonio Spurs (2) (5, 4–1) |
Gregg Popovich |
3–4 |
Miami Heat (1) (4, 3–1) |
Erik Spoelstra |
[93] |
2014 |
San Antonio Spurs (1) (6, 5–1) |
Gregg Popovich |
4–1 |
Miami Heat (2) (5, 3–2) |
Erik Spoelstra |
[94] |
2015 |
Golden State Warriors (1) (7, 4–3) |
Steve Kerr |
4–2 |
Cleveland Cavaliers (2) (2, 0–2) |
David Blatt |
[95] |
2016 |
Golden State Warriors (1) (8, 4–4) |
Steve Kerr |
3–4 |
Cleveland Cavaliers (1) (3, 1–2) |
Tyronn Lue |
[96] |
2017 |
Golden State Warriors (1) (9, 5–4) |
Steve Kerr |
4–1 |
Cleveland Cavaliers (2) (4, 1–3) |
Tyronn Lue |
[97] |
2018 |
Golden State Warriors (2) (10, 6–4) |
Steve Kerr |
4–0 |
Cleveland Cavaliers (4) (5, 1–4) |
Tyronn Lue |
[98] |
2019 |
Golden State Warriors (1) (11, 6–5) |
Steve Kerr |
2–4 |
Toronto Raptors (2) (1, 1–0) |
Nick Nurse |
[99] |
2020[g] |
Los Angeles Lakers (1) (32, 17–15) |
Frank Vogel |
4–2 |
Miami Heat (5) (6, 3–3) |
Erik Spoelstra |
[101] |
2021 |
Phoenix Suns (2) (3, 0–3) |
Monty Williams |
2–4 |
Milwaukee Bucks (3) (3, 2–1) |
Mike Budenholzer |
[102] |
2022 |
Golden State Warriors (3) (12, 6–5) |
Steve Kerr |
0–0 |
Boston Celtics (2) (22, 17–4) |
Ime Udoka |
難得糊塗 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣(40)

從1994年Michael Jordan正式退休,至2010年Lebron James史上最作弊的跳槽埋堆,建立熱火皇朝,十五年間人們最熱門的話題是誰是MJ接班人。
八九十年代能人輩出,從天鉤渣巴到魔術莊遜小鳥布特,再到大夢奧拉祖雲,飛人佐敦,人型坦克巴克利等,簡單說是一至二個人防守基本上無法攔得住,於是九十年代壞孩子軍團PISTON發明了佐敦法則,就是用犯規或即使暴力犯規,惡意犯規,都不能讓飛人輕鬆起手。推而廣之,禁區就是戰場,任何人想要靠近籃框起手都會被裡面的惡漢強硬地拉下來。
難得糊塗 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣(14)

1999[e] |
San Antonio Spurs (1) (1, 1–0) |
Gregg Popovich |
4–1 |
New York Knicks (8) (8, 2–6) |
Jeff Van Gundy |
[77] |
2000 |
Los Angeles Lakers (1) (25, 12–13) |
Phil Jackson |
4–2 |
Indiana Pacers (1) (1, 0–1) |
Larry Bird |
[78] |
2001 |
Los Angeles Lakers (2) (26, 13–13) |
Phil Jackson |
4–1 |
Philadelphia 76ers (1) (9, 3–6) |
Larry Brown |
[79] |
2002 |
Los Angeles Lakers (3) (27, 14–13) |
Phil Jackson |
4–0 |
New Jersey Nets (1) (1, 0–1) |
Byron Scott |
[80] |
2003 |
San Antonio Spurs (1) (2, 2–0) |
Gregg Popovich |
4–2 |
New Jersey Nets (2) (2, 0–2) |
Byron Scott |
[81] |
2004 |
Los Angeles Lakers (2) (28, 14–14) |
Phil Jackson |
1–4 |
Detroit Pistons (3) (6, 3–3) |
Larry Brown |
[82] |
2005 |
San Antonio Spurs (2) (3, 3–0) |
Gregg Popovich |
4–3 |
Detroit Pistons (2) (7, 3–4) |
Larry Brown |
[83] |
2006 |
Dallas Mavericks (4) (1, 0–1) |
Avery Johnson |
2–4 |
Miami Heat (2) (1, 1–0) |
Pat Riley |
[84] |
2007 |
San Antonio Spurs (3) (4, 4–0) |
Gregg Popovich |
4–0 |
Cleveland Cavaliers (2) (1, 0–1) |
Mike Brown |
[85] |
2008 |
Los Angeles Lakers (1) (29, 14–15) |
Phil Jackson |
2–4 |
Boston Celtics (1) (20, 17–3) |
Doc Rivers |
[86] |
2009 |
Los Angeles Lakers (1) (30, 15–15) |
Phil Jackson |
4–1 |
Orlando Magic (3) (2, 0–2) |
Stan Van Gundy |
[87] |
2010 |
Los Angeles Lakers (1) (31, 16–15) |
Phil Jackson |
4–3 |
Boston Celtics (4) (21, 17–4) |
Doc Rivers |
[88] |
2011 |
Dallas Mavericks (3) (2, 1–1) |
Rick Carlisle |
4–2 |
Miami Heat (2) (2, 1–1) |
Erik Spoelstra |
難得糊塗 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣(45)

90年代NBA的籃球轉播開始普及全世界,但內容卻不是華麗有餘的Showtime Lakers, 而是戰無不勝的Michael Jordan.
Jordan之神或被神化,究其原因其實是九十年代的籃球哲學:
難得糊塗 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣(13)

1988 |
Los Angeles Lakers (1) (22, 11–11) |
Pat Riley |
4–3 |
Detroit Pistons (2) (3, 0–3) |
Chuck Daly |
[65] |
1989 |
Los Angeles Lakers (1) (23, 11–12) |
Pat Riley |
0–4 |
Detroit Pistons (1) (4, 1–3) |
Chuck Daly |
[66] |
1990 |
Portland Trail Blazers (3) (2, 1–1) |
Rick Adelman |
1–4 |
Detroit Pistons (1) (5, 2–3) |
Chuck Daly |
[67] |
1991 |
Los Angeles Lakers (3) (24, 11–13) |
Mike Dunleavy |
1–4 |
Chicago Bulls (1) (1, 1–0) |
Phil Jackson |
[68] |
1992 |
Portland Trail Blazers (1) (3, 1–2) |
Rick Adelman |
2–4 |
Chicago Bulls (1) (2, 2–0) |
Phil Jackson |
[69] |
1993 |
Phoenix Suns (1) (2, 0–2) |
Paul Westphal |
2–4 |
Chicago Bulls (2) (3, 3–0) |
Phil Jackson |
[70] |
1994 |
Houston Rockets (2) (3, 1–2) |
Rudy Tomjanovich |
4–3 |
New York Knicks (2) (7, 2–5) |
Pat Riley |
[71] |
1995 |
Houston Rockets (6) (4, 2–2) |
Rudy Tomjanovich |
4–0 |
Orlando Magic (1) (1, 0–1) |
Brian Hill |
[72] |
1996 |
Seattle SuperSonics (1) (3, 1–2) |
George Karl |
2–4 |
Chicago Bulls (1) (4, 4–0) |
Phil Jackson |
[73] |
1997 |
Utah Jazz (1) (1, 0–1) |
Jerry Sloan |
2–4 |
Chicago Bulls (1) (5, 5–0) |
Phil Jackson |
[74] |
1998 |
Utah Jazz (1) (2, 0–2) |
Jerry Sloan |
2–4 |
Chicago Bulls (1) (6, 6–0) |
Phil Jackson |
[75] |
1999[e] |
San Antonio Spurs (1) (1, 1–0) |
Gregg Popovich |
4–1 |
New York Knicks (8) (8, 2–6) |
Jeff Van Gundy |
[77] |
2000 |
Los Angeles Lakers (1) (25, 12–13) |
Phil Jackson |
4–2 |
Indiana Pacers (1) (1, 0–1) |
Larry Bird |
[78] |
難得糊塗 發表在 痞客邦 留言(1) 人氣(18)

看見今年的NBA 75一直不爽。不同年代,不同規則,不同風格,如果單以一時的流行或統計數字就稱為偉大,其實十分馬虎。
最簡單的舉例是忍者龜Russell Westbrook, 一屆常規賽MVP,連續三季平均大三元,史上最多次拿大三元的大三元製造機,在正常球員的巔峰時期(31-33)歲,屢次被評為球隊的累贅,更是Shaq the Fool的常客,犯盡不必要的、令人瞠目結舌的低級錯誤,毫無籃球智慧可言。
難得糊塗 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣(16)

雖然我討厭藍網,不過號稱希臘怪物的字母哥那球墊腳明顯是故意的,這種惡意動作足以摧毀一個球員的職業生涯,非常惡劣。有網友直接把他歷來多次墊腳/攝腳的動作匯集成輯, youtube上大量影片存證。
難得糊塗 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣(14)

這是個美國熱門話題,但其實這個話題根本無須討論,二人實力相差甚遠,只是借機想想當年。
二人確有相似之處。
難得糊塗 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣(58)